CONTENT
|
Poor and ambiguous content.
|
The webpages lacks purpose and theme. Information is inaccurate or
contains significant gaps.
|
The purpose and the theme of the webpages are vague or unclear.
Information is accurate but not always complete. Limited research scope.
|
The webpages has a clearly stated purpose and theme, but have one or
two elements that do not seem to be related to it. Information offers a
comprehensive and accurate picture of the topic. Adequate research scope.
|
The webpages are well stated with clear purpose and theme that is
carried out across all pages. In-depth research calls on a wide variety of
resources. Content is fresh, original and insightful.
|
0 point
|
2.5 points
|
5 points
|
8 points
|
10 points
|
LAYOUT
|
Poor Layout. The Webpage does follow any consistent layout and is
completely random.
|
The Web pages are cluttered looking or confusing. It is often
difficult to locate important elements. Layout does not reflect ideas and
content, seems random.
|
The Web pages have a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It
is easy to locate most of the important elements. Layout is unimaginative.
|
The Web pages have an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to
locate all important elements. Layout is interesting and appropriate for
content.
|
The Webpages has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is
easy to locate all important elements. Layout is creative and attractive and
Layout effects and extends the ideas and content.
|
0 point
|
2.5 points
|
5 points
|
8 points
|
10 points
|
GRAPHICS (background, text color, lists, tables white space,
images & videos)
|
Poor or no Graphics.
|
Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, OR distract the
reader. Poor quality of graphic elements. No sense of purpose for the
inclusion of graphic elements. Little or no evidence of design principles. Only
1 or no image used.
|
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, and are of
good quality. Inconsistent quality of graphic elements. Graphics are used as
âadd - onâsâ rather than as an element of meaning. Some awareness of graphic
design principles is evident. At least 1 image used.
|
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, are of good
quality and enhance reader interest or understanding. Graphic elements are
good quality. Graphic elements contribute to meaning. Graphic design
principles are followed. At least 1 image used.
|
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, are
thoughtfully cropped, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or
understanding. Creative design causes backgrounds and other formatting
elements to work exceptionally well together. Graphic elements are used in
imaginative and effective way. Minimum of 2 images used.
|
0 point
|
1 point
|
3 points
|
5 points
|
8 points
|
FONTS
|
Very poor selection of fonts styles and sizes.
|
A wide variety of fonts, styles and point sizes was used.
|
The fonts are consistent but point size varies inappropriately for
headings and text for different pages.
|
The fonts are consistent, easy to read and point size varies
appropriately for headings and text for most pages.
|
The fonts are consistent, easy to read and point size varies
appropriately for headings and text for all pages. Use of font styles is used
consistently and improves readability.
|
0 point
|
1 point
|
2 points
|
3.5 points
|
5 points
|
GOOGLE APPS (Maps)
|
No Map embedded.
|
Google Map image is used instead and aligned to some extent.
|
Google Map is inserted and aligned to some extent.
|
Google Map embedded with very good professional outlook. The map is
easy to follow and aligned nicely.
|
Google Map embedded with best professional outlook in the correct
page. The map is very easy to follow and aligned professionally.
|
0 point
|
1 point
|
2 points
|
3 points
|
4 points
|
VIDEOS
|
The site does not contain any videos.
|
At least two videos embedded. Videos are somewhat aligned with
content and layout of the webpage. The videos are somewhat relevant to the
topic on that page.
|
At least three videos embedded. Videos are aligned nicely with
content and layout of the webpage. The videos are relevant and specific to
the topic on that page.
|
Videos are aligned nicely with content and layout of the webpage. The
videos are relevant and specific to the topic on that page. At least 5 videos
are embedded in the entire website.
|
All videos are aligned perfectly with content and layout of the
webpage. The videos are relevant and specific to the topic on that page. At
least 7 videos are embedded in the entire website.
|
0 point
|
1 point
|
2 points
|
3.5 points
|
5 points
|
HTML/CSS CODE
|
Used some other web editing tool. No Evidence of coding.
|
Codes on all pages are messy and very difficult to follow. No
comments used and broken styles.
|
Codes on all pages are clear but not so easy to follow. Indented to
some extent. Appropriate use of HTML elements & used mostly inline style.
|
Codes on all pages are clear and easy to follow. Well indented with
comments. Appropriate use of HTML/CSS elements & used mostly internal
style (CSS) or inline style.
|
Codes on all pages are clear and easy to follow. Perfectly indented
with clear comments. Perfect use of HTML/CSS elements & either used
external or internal style (CSS) correctly.
|
0 point
|
2.5 points
|
5 points
|
7.5 points
|
10 points
|
SPELLING AND GRAMMAR
|
The readings do not make any sense.
|
There are more than 5 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
|
There are 4 - 5 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
|
There are 1 - 3 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
|
There are no errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
|
0 point
|
1 point
|
2 points
|
3 points
|
4 points
|
SOURCES OF INFORMATION, IMAGES AND VIDEOS
|
Content sources cannot be comprehended.
|
Information presented are randomly selected from external sources
with no or broken links. Data cannot be comprehended
|
All information presented are from external sources and embedded
directly from source sites. Data is incomplete.
|
A good blend of original and external sources. Elements used from
external sources are extracted and embedded directly from source sites.
|
All images/audio/video/data are balanced between original and external
sources. Elements used from external sources are extracted and embedded
directly from source sites.
|
0 point
|
1 point
|
2 points
|
4 points
|
5 points
|
CRITERIA
|
None of the instructions were followed.
|
Very few instructions were followed.
|
Some instructions were followed.
|
Most of the instructions were followed consistently.
|
All instructions have been followed thoroughly and consistently.
|
0 point
|
1 point
|
2 points
|
3 points
|
4 points
|
DELIVERY
|
After seven days
|
Within seven days.
|
Within four days.
|
Within two days.
|
On or before time.
|
0 point
|
1 point
|
2 points
|
3 points
|
5 points
|
Comments
Add comment