Teaching Philosophy
As a professional teacher, it becomes my responsibility to ensure that all the students are involved in the teaching and learning process. I believe that these can be accomplished through adapting to the different techniques of teaching. This teaching philosophy will highlight my belief in inclusivity and a secure learning environment for all students.
Teaching Philosophy
Microteaching
My microteaching experience showed me a lot about working in front of a classroom. It was very interesting to see how my lesson plan changed as I began to teach. This task taught me how lessons do not always go as planned, how to adapt my approach and the importance of reflecting on my teaching experience.
Microteaching Resource
-
Download Micro_teaching.pptx
Micro_teaching.pptx Details
- Wednesday, 29 June 2022 [1.4MB] -
Download ASSESSMENT FIVE RUBRIC for Microteaching.docx
ASSESSMENT FIVE RUBRIC for Microteaching.docx Details
- Wednesday, 29 June 2022 [34.7KB]ASSESSMENT FIVE RUBRIC for Microteaching.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
-
Download Concept map.pdf
Concept map.pdf Details
- Wednesday, 29 June 2022 [179.7KB]
Reflection on curriculum mapping
Higher Education Innovations in Assessment RSS
Re: GARDNERs response to Learning Task 9 | |
Learning Task 9 Good Afternoon Team Thank you Farid for the summary. A concept map is a graphic representation of a student's knowledge. Having students create these maps can help you gain a deeper understanding of how their knowledge is organized. It can also help you assess their knowledge of course material. Concept mapping is an important tool used in teaching and learning to help students understand the basic concepts and the relationships between them. I have developed the following course map for my course: Course code: ISF21 Course Name: Foundation Information System Topic: Programming and Languages Learning Outcome: At the end of this lesson, students should be able to: 1. Define programming and describe the six steps of programming. 2. Compare design tools including top-down design, pseudocode, flowcharts, and logic structures. 3. Describe program testing and the tools for finding and removing errors. 4. Describe CASE tools and object-oriented software development. 5. Explain the five generations of programming languages. The software that I used to design the concept map is called camp.https://cmap.ihmc.us/ The concept map above highlights the six phases of programming with relevant activities and five generations of languages. Concept maps are especially useful for students who are good at visual learning, but they are beneficial for all types of learners. It's a powerful learning strategy because it helps you get the big picture. Concept maps help you classify information based on meaningful connections by starting with high-level concepts. So, concept mapping is a very helpful tool. Reference Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation (2022), Using Concept Maps - Eberly Center - Carnegie Mellon University. [online] Cmu.edu. Available at: [Accessed 28 May 2022]. Yong Jiang, Chuchu Zheng. (2021) New Methods to Support Effective Collaborative Reflection Among Kindergarten Teachers: An Action Research Approach. Early Childhood Education Journal 49:2, pages 247-258. |
Remote Assessments
Week 2 - Learning Outcomes
Learning and Teaching at a Tertiary Level
Review Paper
Assessment has always been an integral part of higher education, regardless of the context. The reflective paper would provide a comprehensive overview of the various advantages and challenges of online assessments. The COVID-19 outbreak had forced educational institutions to adopt and implement technology to help them survive. Higher Education institutions should also focus on developing the necessary skills and knowledge to make their students employable. Due to the nature of online courses, the interactions between the students and instructors are not always the same as those in a traditional classroom setting. This has caused many instructors to feel that they are not being given enough attention. Academic dishonesty has a serious issue that could affect the quality of a student's education. It can also lead to the perception that the hard work of the students is not being rewarded. One of the most critical factors that higher education institutes must consider when it comes to using online platforms is the reliability and validity of the assessments. Assessment strategies such as concept mapping, creating an application or case-based question, incorporating support materials and increasing the difficulty of question are some ways to overcome challenges in an online environment. The paper also aims to contribute to the development of policies that will encourage the use of online assessments in higher education in the South Pacific.
Individual Paper
-
Download ED401_ASSIGNMENT 4 S11109474.docx
ED401_ASSIGNMENT 4 S11109474.docx Details
- Wednesday, 29 June 2022 [150KB]ED401_ASSIGNMENT 4 S11109474.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
Group Review Paper
COVID-19 and its impact on the education system hauled many Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) to re-strategize and revamp their teaching pedagogies and philosophy in order to ensure the continuation of education for the elite generation. As such, educational reforms were necessary following the challenges faced by traditional means of teaching and learning while comparing the interaction rate between a learner and an instructor. At the University of the South (USP), remote learning quickly picked up the momentum which was highly accepted by academics and students. The success of remote learning could be due to the rate at which technology was integrated as it is considered to be the most important parameter in transforming any education system and was the only key to survival for many HEIs in the South Pacific. While assessments are crucial in any education system, it demands more creativeness and eminence regardless of the context to ensure learners achieve all the graduate outcomes. While USP and HEIs in the South Pacific are bracing and preparing for any other unprecedented events like COVID-19 in the future, it is important to review each aspect of educational reforms which compromises teaching pedagogies, adopted assessments and the rate at which technology is incorporated in lessons. Hence in this review paper, three key areas of interest for HEIs in the South Pacific will be discussed which are the educational reforms from a learner’s perspective; the effects of integrating technology in learning procedures and a comprehensive overview of the various advantages and challenges of online assessments. This paper will also outline some of the recommendations that can be undertaken to polish up the existing educational system.
Group Paper Resources
-
Download Assignment 4 with RUBRIC for Review Paper Gardner-1.docx
Assignment 4 with RUBRIC for Review Paper Gardner-1.docx Details
- Wednesday, 29 June 2022 [20.4KB]Assignment 4 with RUBRIC for Review Paper Gardner-1.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
-
Download ED401 GROUP PRESENTATION_Gardner.pptx
ED401 GROUP PRESENTATION_Gardner.pptx Details
- Wednesday, 29 June 2022 [826.6KB]ED401 GROUP PRESENTATION_Gardner.pptx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
-
Download ED401_ASSIGNMENT 4 S11109474.docx
ED401_ASSIGNMENT 4 S11109474.docx Details
- Wednesday, 29 June 2022 [150KB]ED401_ASSIGNMENT 4 S11109474.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
-
Download Gardner_Peer review.docx
Gardner_Peer review.docx Details
- Wednesday, 29 June 2022 [48.1KB]Gardner_Peer review.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
Course audit and redesign
The course audit and redesign is an opportunity for you to review your current course’s curriculum with the intention to improve it further ensuring that the curriculum is constructively aligned.
ISF21-course audit and redesign
-
Download Assignment 3 with RUBRIC for Course Audit and Redesign.docx
Assignment 3 with RUBRIC for Course Audit and Redesign.docx Details
- Thursday, 30 June 2022 [40.8KB]Assignment 3 with RUBRIC for Course Audit and Redesign.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
-
Download Rishneel_Narayan _Course Audit Proposed Innovation Changes.docx
Rishneel_Narayan _Course Audit Proposed Innovation Changes.docx Details
- Thursday, 30 June 2022 [1.5MB]Rishneel_Narayan _Course Audit Proposed Innovation Changes.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
Personal Reflective Log
-
Download S11109474_RishneelNarayan_Wk1-4.docx
S11109474_RishneelNarayan_Wk1-4.docx Details
- Thursday, 30 June 2022 [88KB]S11109474_RishneelNarayan_Wk1-4.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
-
Download RishneelNarayan _Personal Reflective Log 2.docx
RishneelNarayan _Personal Reflective Log 2.docx Details
- Thursday, 30 June 2022 [44.9KB]RishneelNarayan _Personal Reflective Log 2.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
-
Download Personal Reflective Log 3.docx
Personal Reflective Log 3.docx Details
- Thursday, 30 June 2022 [178.5KB]Personal Reflective Log 3.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
-
Download Rishneel Narayan_Personal Reflective Log_4.docx
Rishneel Narayan_Personal Reflective Log_4.docx Details
- Thursday, 30 June 2022 [170.2KB]Rishneel Narayan_Personal Reflective Log_4.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
-
Download Rishneel_Narayan _special session.docx
Rishneel_Narayan _special session.docx Details
- Thursday, 30 June 2022 [34.9KB]Rishneel_Narayan _special session.docx (Imported from Remote host USP-Moodle)
RUBRIC Reflective Learning: Self-Assessment Report of QoT ePortfolio evidence
Student Development Reflection
Higher Education Innovations in Assessment
Re: GARDNERs response to Learning Task 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response to learning task 11.
Course Learning Outcome Demonstrate the use of the Internet and apply available web tools to create a webpage. Topic:Â Web sign Intended Learning outcome
Assessment Write your own HTML/CSS code in Notepad++ to create your Webpages. Marking RubricÂ
 Rubrics help students, parents and teacher identify what quality work is. Students can judge their own work and accept more responsibility of the final product. Rubrics help the teaching staff to easily explain to the student why they got the grade that they received. When students are given the rubrics prior to the task, the studentsâ success is not left purely to chance. Since expectations and requirements are clearly identified on rubrics, students can understand where they need to work to improve their results. A well-designed rubric allows teachers to compare a studentâs performance or product to what it should be rather than to another studentâs performance.Reference Andrade, H., & Ying, D. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1-11.  Arter, J. & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Corwin Press. Brookhart, S. M., and Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educ. Rev. 67, 343â368. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2014.929565 |
Constructive Alignment in action
GARDNERs response to Learning Task 12 | ||||||||||
Good Evening Team This week, I'd like to take the lead in our group discussion. Please feel free to make any comments on my summary. Constructive Alignment A constructive alignment design is a framework that aims to make sure that students are learning what they are supposed to learn. It involves clearly stating the expectations of the students and engaging them in activities that will help them reach their goals. Assessment tasks are also designed to enable clear and objective judgments about the effectiveness of the teaching. Constructive alignment occurs when we involve the students in activities that are designed to help them develop their skills and knowledge. It can also occur when the assessment is aligned with our goals and the expectations of the students. If the assessment is conducted in a manner that is aligned with our intentions, then students are more likely to achieve their goals. In the higher educational institute's recommended method for unit design, the framework of constructive alignment is represented: âImbalance in the system will lead to poor teaching and surface learning. Non-alignment is signified by inconsistencies, unmet expectations, and practices that contradict what we preachâ (Biggs 2003: 26) The increasing emphasis on the importance of assessment practice has led to a shift in the way university teaching is conducted. Instead of focusing on the individual teacher, it has been shifted to a more systematic approach that involves the institution. One of the concerning factors in higher education that affects the constructivist approach is benchmarking and defining outcomes, such as in LTAS and the statements of graduate attributes, which provides an outcomes-based framework into which outcomes-based models of teaching and assessment readily fit. All of these concerning institutional issues can be overcome through curriculum review and adjusting the internal operations for the benefit of our students. Â Learning task 12 Course: ISF21 â Foundation Information Systems Mode: Blended Session type: Tutorial Course learning outcome: Describe all phases of Systems Analysis and Design. Â
 The constructivist approach is very helpful in the teaching and learning process as it enables students to develop critical thinking and develop an understanding of content. The students were able to relate the content to a real-life scenario instead of writing the textbook definitions. Lastly, peer assessment was one of the best learning tools that I have learnt in this course. Peer assessment in my tutorial session was effective as it encouraged students to critically reflect on each others' work and identify gaps in their knowledge. References Biggs. J. (2003) Teaching for Quality Learning at University â What the Student Does 2nd Edition SRHE / Open University Press, Buckingham.  Available at http://udprism01.ucd.ie/TalisPrism/doOpenURLSearch.do?sid=Talis:prod_talis&pid=Key%3A1400700%3BArtifactType%3AMarc21Slim%3BsearchLocation%3Atalislms Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5-22. Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Thank you Rishneel |